DIGITALIZATION-BASED INTEGRATION OF CLIMATE POLICIES OF UKRAINE AND THE EU

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35774/jee2023.01.093

Keywords:

Climate policy, climate-neutral economy, digitalization, Ukraine, the EU, CBAM, NDC2.

Abstract

The article investigates the problem of climate policy integration between the European Union and Ukraine, taking into consideration the current targets of climate-resilient development and the possibilities for digitalization of the components of this process. The author performs a systematization of the modern programme documents and mechanisms that are fundamental to the implementation of climate policies in the EU and Ukraine. The author also highlights the innovations of the «Fit for 55» programme and identifies the EU’s climate policy targets for the coming decade. In particular, the author performs an analysis of the potential impact of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) on Ukrainian producers. The findings of the study show that the existing pace of emissions reductions in line with Nationally Determined Contributions of Ukraine and the EU is insufficient to achieve the net-zero level of emissions and to build the climateneutral economy before the internationally adopted milestone years of 2030 and 2050. The author substantiates the need for climate policy intensification through imposition of stricter restrictions on GHG emissions, as well as determines the expediency of increasing Ukraine’s NDC2 from 65% to at least 72%, which would ensure the sufficient pace of climate strategy implementation that would align with the Paris Agreement. Digitalization in this article is viewed as a tool, a process and an enabling environment for acceleration of climate-friendly changes, as well as a factor of overcoming the barriers to integration between the climate policies of the EU and Ukraine.

JEL: F29, O14, O57

Author Biography

Irina MAKSYMOVA, State University of Economics and Technology, Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine

PhD, Associate Professor, Head of International Relations Department

References

Bauer, P., Stevens, B., & Hazeleger, W. (2021). A digital twin of Earth for the green transition. Nature Climate Change, 11(2), 80-83. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-00986-y

Boasson, E. L., & Tatham, M. (2023). Climate policy: From complexity to consensus? Journal of European Public Policy, 30(3), 401-424. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2022.2150272

Boasson, E. L., Burns, C., & Pulver, S. (2023). The politics of domestic climate governance: Making sense of complex participation patterns. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(3), 513-536. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2022.2096102

Climate Action Tracker. (2023). CAT rating methodology. https://climateactiontracker.org/

Delreux, T., & Ohler, F. (2019). Climate policy in European Union politics. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1097

EBRD. (2020). Project «Support to the Government of Ukraine on updating its Nationally-Determined Contribution». Report 3: Report on modeling (in Ukrainian). https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/ukr203478.pdf

European Commission. (2022). Strategic Foresight Report: Twinning the green and digital transitions in the new geopolitical context (COM(2022) 289 final).https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52022DC0289&from=EN

European Commission. (2021). «Fit for 55»: Delivering the EU's 2030 Climate Target on the way to climate neutrality (COM(2021) 550 final). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52021DC0550&from=EN

Geels, F. W., Sovacool, B. K., Schwanen, T., & Sorrell, S. (2017). Sociotechnical transitions for deep decarbonization. Science, 357(6357), 1242–1244. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao3760

Halushkina, T. P., Zhemba, A. I., & Sernytska, K. V. (2018). Ecological policy of Ukraine in the context of global climatic challenges [in Ukrainian]. Visnyk Natsionalnoho Universytetu Vodnoho Hospodarstva ta Pryrodokorystuvannia. Seriia «Ekonomichni nauky», 4(84), 248-258. http://dx.doi.org/10.31713/ve4201824

Hushko, S., Botelho, J. M., Maksymova, I., Slusarenko, K., & Kulishov, V. (2021). Sustainable development of global mineral resources market in Industry 4.0 context. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science(Vol. 628, No. 1, p. 012025). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/628/1/012025

Hutsaliuk, V. (2022). Peculiarities of the EU’s normative power use for the establishment of climate-related values in Ukraine [in Ukrainian]. COPERNICUS Political and Legal Studies, 1(1), 38–4. https://doi.org/10.15804/CPLS.20221.04

Ivasechko, O. Ya., & Melnyk, B. P. (2021). Green Deal climate policy strategy: Features of implementation in the EU and in Ukraine [in Ukrainian]. Rehionalni Studii, 26, 43-48. https://doi.org/10.32782/2663-6170/2021.26.9

Jordan, A. J., & Moore, B. (2022). The durability–flexibility dialectic: The evolution of decarbonisation policies in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(3), 425-444. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2022.2042721

Khabatiuk, O., & Andrusevych, A. (2021). The impact of Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) on the EU - Ukraine trade [in Ukrainian]. Resource and Analysis Centre «Society and Environment».https://www.rac.org.ua/uploads/content/624/files/cbamukraineua.pdf

Maksymova, I., & Kurylyak, V. (2022). World industry digitization in the context of ensuring climate neutrality. Journal of European Economy, 21(3), 343-360.https://doi.org/10.35774/jee2022.03.343

Mercure, J.-F., Salas, P., Vercoulen, P., Semieniuk, G., Lam, A., Pollitt, H. P. B., Vakilifard, N., Chewpreecha, U., Edwards, N. R., & Vinuales, J. E. (2021). Reframing incentives for climate policy action. Nature Energy, 6, 1133-1143. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-021-00934-2

Nascimento, L., Kuramochi, T., Iacobuta, G., den Elzen, M., Fekete, H., Weishaupt, M., van Soest, H.L., Roelfsema, M., De Vivero-Serrano, G., Lui, S., Hans, F., de Villafranca Casas, M. J., & Höhne, N. (2022). Twenty years of climate policy: G20 coverage and gaps. Climate Policy, 22(2), 158-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2021.1993776

Nativi, S., Mazzetti, P., & Craglia, M. (2021). Digital ecosystems for developing Digital Twins of the Earth: The Destination Earth case. Remote Sensing, 13, 2119. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13112119

Sovacool, B. K., Baum, C. M., Low, S., Roberts, C., & Steinhauser, J. (2022). Climate policy for a net-zero future: Ten recommendations for Direct Air Capture. Environmental Research Letters, 17(7), 074014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac77a4

United Nations Environment Programme. (2022). Emissions Gap Report 2022: The Closing Window — Climate crisis calls for rapid transformation of societies. https://www.unep.org/emissions-gap-report-2022

Victor, D. G., Geels, F. W., & Sharpe, S. (2019). Accelerating the low carbon transition. The case for stronger, more targeted and coordinated international action. Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Coordinatedactionreport.pdf

Wendler, F. (2022). Contesting the European Union in a changing climate: Policy narratives and the justification of supranational governance. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 30(1), 67-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2021.1882107

Received: February 3, 2023.

Reviewed: February 5, 2023.

Accepted: February 11, 2023.

Published

11.04.2023

How to Cite

MAKSYMOVA, Irina. “DIGITALIZATION-BASED INTEGRATION OF CLIMATE POLICIES OF UKRAINE AND THE EU”. Journal of European Economy, vol. 22, no. 1, Apr. 2023, pp. 94-110, doi:10.35774/jee2023.01.093.

Issue

Section

INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC RELATIONS OF THE EUROPEAN COUNTRIES