EFFICIENCY OF THE NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE ZONE
Keywords:
Integration processes, free trade zone, American-Canadian Free Trade Agreement, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), trade liberalization, tariff and non-tariff instruments, partner countries, foreign direct investment (FDI), economic impactAbstract
The creation, evolution and features of implementing the North American Free Trade Area are considered. The precondition of creating and subsequently operating the North American free trade zone became «Plan Abbott», the main purpose of which was to stimulate American investment in leading Canadian industries. Having signed an agreement on liberalization of trade, the automotive industries of the US and Canada negotiated and signed the US-Canada Free Trade Agreement. The main provisions of the North American Free Trade Agreement, which concerned primarily the removal of all tariff and non-tariff barriers on produced and sold commodities in North America for fifteen years after the agreement came into force are characterized. Other main objectives of the FTA in North America are as follows: an increase in employment rates and improvements in working conditions and living standards; intellectual property rights; management of trade relations and disputes; performance of labour, environmental laws and regulations; cooperation in terms of regional and multilateral trade forums. The performance of economic reforms in Mexico towards liberalization of protectionist trade and investment policies aimed at attracting foreign direct investment and economic growth stimulation are estimated. Measures in the field of removal the tariff and non-tariff instruments made by Mexico after it became a member of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) are analyzed. The implemented measures of liberalization trade allowed Mexico to transform from one the most protectionist economies in the world to one of the most open. The different opinions on the NAFTA creation and its impact on the economic development of member countries are considered. The supporters argued that the agreement would help to create thousands of jobs, reduce income inequality within region, and support the further deepening of economic relationships of the USA and Canada with Mexico. At the same time, opponents believe that a free trade zone in North America will lead to huge job losses and wage reductions in the USA. The effects of NAFTA on production, employment, trade and investment environment of the USA with member countries of the integration union are investigated.
References
Sledziewska K. Theory of Economic Integration [Electronic resource] / K. Sledziewska. - Mode of access : www.wne.uw.edu.pl/~sledziewska.
Angeles M. Villarreal. The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) / Angeles M. Villarreal, Ian F. Fergusson // Congressional Research Service. -2015. - April. - Р. 1-33.
Jeffrey J. Schott Peterson. The North American Free Trade Agreement: Time for a Change? / Jeffrey J. Schott Peterson // 7th Annual North American Regional Meeting. The Trilateral Commission. Ottawa. - 2008. - November. -Р. 1-21.
Scott E. Robert. Heading South: U.S.-Mexico Trade and Job Displacement under NAFTA / Scott E. Robert // Economic Policy Institute. - 2011. - May.
Pardee Center S. Frederick. The Future of North American Trade Policy: Lessons from NAFTA / Pardee Center S. Frederick // Boston University. -2009. - November.
Комар Н. В. Зони вільної торгівлі: еволюція і ефекти для країн-учасниць / Н. В. Комар // Вісник Тернопільського національного економічного університету. - 2015. - № 1. - С. 68-79.
Комар Н. В. Особливості формування зони вільної торгівлі в Північній Америці / Н. В. Комар // Вісник Тернопільського національного економічного університету. - 2016. - № 1. - С. 110-117.
Caliendo L. Estimates of the Trade and Welfare Effects of NAFTA / L. Caliendo, F. Parro // National Bureau of Economic Research. - 2012. -November. - Р. 1-5.
The U. S. International Trade Commission’s Interactive Tariff and Trade Data Web [Electronic resource]. - Mode of access : http://dataweb.usitc.gov.
The Bureau of Economic Analysis online database [Electronic resource]. -Mode of access : http://www.bea.gov.
U. S. International Trade Commission (USITC). «The Impact of Trade Agreements: Effect of the Tokyo Round, U.S.-Israel FTA, U.S.-Canada FTA, NAFTA, and the Uruguay Round on the U.S. Economy». - 2003. - August. -Publication 3621.
Lynch K. Canada’s Challenge-From Good to Great / K. Lynch // Inside Policy. -2012. - October.
Куриляк В. Є. Міжкультурний менеджмент : моногр. / В. Є. Куриляк. - Тернопіль : Астон, 2004. - 239с.
Румянцев А. П. Міжнародна економіка : підруч. / А. П. Румянцев. - К. : Знання, 2009. - 541 с.
Філіпенко А. С. Міжнародні інтеграційні процеси сучасності : моногр. / А. С. Філіпенко, В. С. Будкін, М. А. Дудченко [та ін.]. - К. : Знання, 2004. -304 c.
Савельєв Є. В. Європейська інтеграція і маркетинг: наукові нариси / Є. В. Савельєв. - Тернопіль : Екон. думка, 2003. - 482 с.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).