DIGITAL DIVIDE AND TYPOLOGY OF EUROPEAN UNION COUNTRIES ACROSS TWO MEASUREMENT REGIMES OF THE DIGITAL ECONOMY AND SOCIETY INDEX
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35774/jee2026.03.579Keywords:
cluster analysis, convergence, Digital Decade, digital divide, Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI), European Union.Abstract
The article assesses the digital divide and develops a typology of EU countries by the level and dynamics of digital development across two measurement regimes: the composite Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI), 2016–2021, and the Digital Decade indicator system, 2021–2025. The discontinuation of the composite DESI after 2022 and the transition to the Digital Decade system created a structural incompatibility in the dynamics, preventing direct comparison across the reform. Indicators are placed on a common dimensionless scale, the divide is measured by the cross-country standard deviation of the domain score, and the typology is built by two clustering methods whose agreement is checked. The direction of change in the digital divide varies by domain and regime; the gap widened in 3 of 4 DESI domains, whereas in the Digital Decade regime Digital Public Services and Human Capital converge fastest and Integration diverges. A typology of 3 country groups is identified and reproduced in both regimes, all groups clearing the stability threshold under the main resampling scheme; the transition between regimes was accompanied by 8 of 27 countries changing group. The digital level is closely related to GDP per capita, whereas grouping by digital features does not coincide with the income partition. A country typology compared across the two regimes and a quantitative estimate of the structural shift between them are proposed for the first time. The results give an instrument for comparative analysis that stays valid when the measurement system changes, because it compares partitions rather than indicator values.
JEL: C38, O33, C43, L86.
References
Andrei, J. V., Chivu, L., Sima, V., Gheorghe, I. G., Nancu, D., & Duică, M. (2023). Investigating the digital convergence in European Union: An econometric analysis of pitfalls and pivots of digital economic transformation. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 36(2), Article 2142814. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2142814
Arbelaitz, O., Gurrutxaga, I., Muguerza, J., Pérez, J. M., & Perona, I. (2013). An extensive comparative study of cluster validity indices. Pattern Recognition, 46(1), 243–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2012.07.021
Bánhidi, Z., Dobos, I., & Nemeslaki, A. (2020). What the overall Digital Economy and Society Index reveals: A statistical analysis of the DESI EU28 dimensions. Regional Statistics, 10(2), 42–62. https://doi.org/10.15196/RS100209
Borowiecki, R., Siuta-Tokarska, B., Maroń, J., Suder, M., Thier, A., & Żmija, K. (2021). Developing digital economy and society in the light of the issue of digital convergence of the markets in the European Union countries. Energies, 14(9), Article 2717. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14092717
Bruno, G., Diglio, A., Piccolo, C., & Pipicelli, E. (2023). A reduced Composite Indicator for Digital Divide measurement at the regional level: An applicationto the Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 190, Article 122461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122461
Cruz-Jesus, F., Oliveira, T., & Bacao, F. (2012). Digital divide across the European Union. Information & Management, 49(6), 278–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2012.09.003
de Maya Matallana, M., García-Luque, O., López-Martínez, M., & Rodríguez-Pasquín, M. (2026). Digital development levels in the European Union: Measurement and analysis. Economies, 14(2), Article 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies14020058
Dobos, I., & Bánhidi, Z. (2025). Where Central and Eastern European countries stand in terms of digital readiness. Society and Economy, 47(1), 66–84. https://doi.org/10.1556/204.2024.00012
European Commission. (2026a). Digital economy and Society indicators [Data set].Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology. https://digital-decade-desi.digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/datasets/desi/charts
European Commission. (2026b). Commission Staff Working Document: DESI 2026 methodological note (SWD(2026) 154 final). Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/news-redirect/938549
Eurostat. (n.d.). Eurostat database [Data set]. European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/main/data/database
Gomes, A., & Dias, J. G. (2025). Digital divide in the European Union: A typology of EU citizens. Social Indicators Research, 176(1), 149–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-024-03452-2
Greco, S., Ishizaka, A., Tasiou, M., & Torrisi, G. (2019). On the methodological framework of composite indices: A review of the issues of weighting, aggregation, and robustness. Social Indicators Research, 141(1), 61–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1832-9
Hennig, C. (2007). Cluster-wise assessment of cluster stability. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 52(1), 258–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2006.11.025
Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6(2), 65–70. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4615733
Kolupaieva, I., & Tiesheva, L. (2023). Asymmetry and convergence in the development of digital technologies in the EU countries. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 18(3), 687–716. https://economicpolicy.pl/index.php/eq/article/view/2699
Kovač, N., Żmija, K., Roy, J. K., Kusa, R., & Duda, J. (2024). Digital divide and digitalization in Europe: A bibliometric analysis. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 19(2), 463–520. https://economic-policy.pl/index.php/eq/article/view/2899
Kovács, T. Z., Bittner, B., Huzsvai, L., & Nábrádi, A. (2022). Convergence and the Matthew effect in the European Union based on the DESI index. Mathematics, 10(4), Article 613. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10040613
Kuc-Czarnecka, M., Lo Piano, S., & Saltelli, A. (2020). Quantitative storytelling in the making of a composite indicator. Social Indicators Research, 149(3), 775–802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02276-0
Masoura, M., & Malefaki, S. (2023). Evolution of the Digital Economy and Society Index in the European Union: A socioeconomic perspective. TalTech Journal of European Studies, 13(2), 177–203. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2023-0020
Milligan, G. W., & Cooper, M. C. (1988). A study of standardization of variables in cluster analysis. Journal of Classification, 5(2), 181–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01897163
Murtagh, F., & Legendre, P. (2014). Ward’s hierarchical agglomerative clustering method: Which algorithms implement Ward’s criterion? Journal of Classification, 31(3), 274–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00357-014-9161-z
Olczyk, M., & Kuc-Czarnecka, M. (2022). Digital transformation and economic growth – DESI improvement and implementation. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 28(3), 775–803. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2022.16766
Saraçlı, S., Doğan, N., & Doğan, İ. (2013). Comparison of hierarchical cluster analysis methods by cophenetic correlation. Journal of Inequalities and Applications, 2013, Article 203. https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2013-203
Stavytskyy, A., Kharlamova, G., & Stoica, E. A. (2019). The analysis of the Digital Economy and Society Index in the EU. TalTech Journal of European Studies, 9(3), 245–261. https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2019-0032
Szajt, M., Smoląg, K., & Chomiak-Orsa, I. (2024). Digitization in European Union countries. Convergence analysis based on DESI. Procedia Computer Science, 246, 5448–5457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.09.688
Szeles, M. R., & Simionescu, M. (2020). Regional patterns and drivers of the EU digital economy. Social Indicators Research, 150(1), 95–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02287-x
Troitiño, D. R. (2022). The European Union facing the 21st century: The digital revolution. TalTech Journal of European Studies, 12(1), 60–78. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2022-0003
Warrens, M. J., & van der Hoef, H. (2022). Understanding the adjusted Rand index and other partition comparison indices based on counting object pairs. Journal of Classification, 39(3), 487–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00357-022-09413-z
Zeinali, Z., & Mussari, R. (2025). Expansion of the digital realm: Analyzing DESI and digital transformation across EU member states, with a focus on Spain and Italy: A cluster analysis. Public Organization Review, 25, 1233–1273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-025-00836-x
Zherlitsyn, D. (2024). Financial data analysis using Python. Mercury Learning and Information. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501521843
Zherlitsyn, D., Kolarov, K., & Rekova, N. (2025). Digital transformation in the EU: Bibliometric analysis and digital economy trends highlights. Digital, 5(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/digital5010001
Zherlitsyn, D., & Rekova, N. (2026). Comparative analysis of labor markets in Bulgaria, Italy, and the UK: Wage dynamics, labor costs, and digital development. Economies, 14(1), Article 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies14010013
Received: June 28, 2026.
Reviewed: September 10, 2026.
Accepted: September 18, 2026.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).



