THE ECONOMIC MECHANISM FOR REFORMATTING OUTSOURCED ACCOUNTING SERVICES MARKETS IN THE EU

Authors

Keywords:

accounting outsourcing, anti-money laundering, market consolidation, market regulation, professional licensing.

Abstract

Against the backdrop of the European Union's ongoing harmonisation of professional service markets and the strengthening of anti-money laundering frameworks, this study examines how mandatory professional licensing functions as a market regulation mechanism in the outsourced accounting sector. The study develops a theoretical and conceptual model identifying the causal chain through which regulatory intervention generates compliance costs that operate as entry barriers, produce quality signalling effects, drive pricing adjustments, consolidate the provider market, and generate regulatory avoidance behaviour. Drawing on institutional theory, service quality frameworks, and market consolidation theory, the study analyses how licensing reshapes professional service markets in the European economic space. A longitudinal quasi-experimental before-after design is applied to comprehensive sectoral data spanning 2005–2025, covering 3,567 licensed providers, turnover trends, and comparative institutional evidence from 27 EU member states. Descriptive statistics and theoretical triangulation connect observed licensing effects with SERVQUAL dimensions, institutional isomorphism, and market consolidation theory. Following mandatory licensing in troduced in 2021–2023 in Latvia, the number of providers declined by 14.6% by 2025, while sector turnover grew by approximately 13% annually. By March 2025, 86% of providers had obtained licences. Licensing strengthened quality signalling and encouraged client migration toward licensed providers, while also contributing to indicative price increases of approximately 10% to 15%, regulatory avoidance through NACE code switching, and disproportionate compliance pressure on micro-enterprises. The study adds original empirical evidence from an emerging EU market and offers policy recommendations to improve enforcement, professional education, and regulatory effectiveness in the European economic space.

JEL: M40, M41, K20, L84.

Author Biographies

Dace SNIKERE-KLITKO, RTU Rezekne Academy of Technologies, Rezekne, Latvia. 

Doctoral Student of Economics, Department of Economics and Finance

Iluta ARBIDANE, RTU Rezekne Academy of Technologies, Rezekne, Latvia. 

Doctor of Economics, Associate Professor, Department of Economics and Finance

References

Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. The University of Chicago Press.

Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1989, May). Small-firm entry in US manufacturing. Economica, 56(222), 255–265. https://doi.org/10.2307/2554043

Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488–500. https://doi.org/10.2307/1879431

Carpenter, D. M. II, Knepper, L., Erickson, A. C., & Ross, J. K. (2012, May). License to work: A national study of burdens from occupational licensing (1st ed.). Institute for Justice.https://ij.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/licensetowork1.pdf

Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia. (2025, November 14). Entrepreneurship indicators of enterprises 2005-2024 (UFR010) [Data set]. https://stat.gov.lv/en/statistics-themes/business/entrepreneurship-indicators/tables/ufr010-entrepreneurship-indicators

Council of Europe. (2018, July). Anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing measures: Latvia: Fifth Round Mutual Evaluation Report (No. 8).

Committee of Experts on the Evaluation of Anti-Money Laundering Measures and the Financing of Terrorism (MONEYVAL). https://rm.coe.int/moneyval-2018-8-5th-round-mer-latvia/16808ce61b

DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101

Eurostat. (n.d.-a). Structural business statistics: Database. Retrieved March 31, 2025, from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/structural-business-statistics

Eurostat. (n.d.-b). Business demography by legal form and NACE Rev.2 activity. [Data set] Retrieved March 31, 2025, from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/bd_l_form__custom_16622368/default/table?lang=en

Eurostat. (n.d.-c). Annual enterprise statistics by size class for special aggregates of NACE Rev. 2 activities (2005-2020) (sbs_sc_sca_r2). [Data set] https://doi.org/10.2908/sbs_sc_sca_r2

Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. The University of Chicago Press. Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R., & Hinings, C. R. (2002). Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 58–80. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069285

Kleiner, M. M. (2000). Occupational licensing. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(4), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.14.4.189

Kleiner, M. M., & Krueger, A. B. (2013). Analyzing the extent and influence of occupational licensing on the labor market. Journal of Labor Economics, 31 (S1), S173–S202. https://doi.org/10.1086/669060

Larson, M. S. (1977). The rise of professionalism: A sociological analysis. University of California Press. Latvian Enterprise Register. (n.d.). Commercial register information system. Retrieved March 30, 2025, from https://www.ur.gov.lv/en/

Leland, H. E. (1979). Quacks, lemons, and licensing: A theory of minimum quality standards. Journal of Political Economy, 87(6), 1328–1346. https://doi.org/10.1086/260838

Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550

Mikko, V. (2018). Outsourcing accounting functions: Measuring benefits, impact on capabilities, and firm performance [Master’s thesis, Oulu Business School]. https://oulurepo.oulu.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/11371/nbnfioulu-201806062465.pdf

Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4279002

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multipleitem scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64 (1), 12–40.

Saeima. (2021). Grāmatvedībaslikums [Accounting law]. https://likumi.lv/ta/id/324249-gramatvedibas-likums

Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Sharma, G. K. (2023). Advantages & impacts of outsourcing accounting to accounting firms. International Journal of Financial Management and Economics, 6(1), 239–244. https://doi.org/10.33545/26179210.2023.v6.i1.204

State Revenue Service. (n.d.). Licencēto ārpakalpojuma grāmatvežu reģistrs [Registry of licensed accounting service providers]. Retrieved March 31, 2025, from https://www6.vid.gov.lv/LAGR?utm_source

Stigler, G. J. (1971). The theory of economic regulation. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003160

The White House. (2015, July). Occupational licensing: A framework for policymakers. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/docs/licensing_report_final_nonembargo.pdf

Received: April 7, 2026.

Reviewed: May 20, 2026.

Accepted: June 15, 2026.

Downloads

Published

30.06.2026

How to Cite

SNIKERE-KLITKO, Dace, and Iluta ARBIDANE. “THE ECONOMIC MECHANISM FOR REFORMATTING OUTSOURCED ACCOUNTING SERVICES MARKETS IN THE EU”. Journal of European Economy, vol. 25, no. 2, June 2026, pp. 494-13, https://jeej.wunu.edu.ua/index.php/enjee/article/view/1943.

Issue

Section

TERTIARY SECTOR ECONOMICS