THE IMPACT OF NON-TARIFF BARRIERS OF THE EU ON THE EXPORT OF KEY AGRARIAN GOODS OF UKRAINE

Authors

Keywords:

ad valorem equivalent; agricultural export; non-tariff barriers; regression modeling; SPS notifications; TBT standards; temporary trade liberalization; Ukraine – EU.

Abstract

The article analyses the impact of the European Union’s non-tariff barriers – particularly sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) measures and technical barriers to trade (TBT) – on the volume and structure of Ukraine’s agricultural exports over the period 2015–2025. The aim of the study is to quantitatively assess the trade costs generated by EU regulatory requirements and to identify patterns in their influence on the commodity composition of exports, taking into account institutional developments such as the implementation of the DCFTA Agreement and temporary trade liberalization measures. The methodological framework of the research is based on gravity modeling using the PPML estimator, complemented by the calculation of ad valorem equivalents that capture the magnitude of non-tariff pressure.

Unlike previous studies, this work provides the first detailed quantitative assessment of the impact of SPS notifications on specific groups of Ukrainian agricultural products over a ten-year period, enabling the identification of hidden trade costs generated by regulatory requirements. The analysis reveals differentiated sensitivity across product groups: exports of sugar and sunflower oil are the most vulnerable to increasing SPS burdens, whereas the impact of TBT measures exhibits greater heterogeneity and is partially mitigated by the digitalization of procedures and the harmonization of technical standards.

The results offer new insights into the role of non-tariff barriers in shaping Ukraine’s agricultural trade flows and form an analytical basis for enhancing the effectiveness of export support policies, aligning production processes with European standards, and developing digital certification platforms. The proposed approach also makes it possible to forecast future trade costs and optimize strategies for entering the EU market, which is of practical importance for building a resilient and competitive Ukrainian agricultural export sector under conditions of intensifying regulatory pressure.

JEL: F13, Q17, C33, F15.

Author Biographies

Olena BUTENKO, Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics, Kharkiv, Ukraine

PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Department of International Economics and Management

Olena KOT, Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics, Kharkiv, Ukraine

PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Department of International Economics and Management

Viktoria KOZUB, Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics, Kharkiv, Ukraine

PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Department of International Economics and Management

References

Abnett, K., & Polityuk, P. (2025, June 6). EU reimposes pre-war agri duties on Ukraine, seeks compromise in new deal. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/new-eu-ukraine-agri-trade-quotas-be-in-between-currentdeal-wartime-exemptions-2025-06-06/

Akune, Y. (2023). Sanitary and phytosanitary measures and technical barriers totrade as non-tariff measures to agri-food trade in the Asia-Pacific. Australasian Journal of Regional Studies, 29(1), 133–152. https://www.anzrsai.org/assets/Uploads/PublicationChapter/AJRS-29-1-2023-paper-07-Final.pdf

Barba Navaretti, G., Felice, G., Forlani, E., & Garella, P. G. (2022). Non-tariff measures and competitiveness. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4302541

Beghin, J., Disdier, A.-C., Marette, S., & van Tongeren, F. (2011). Measuring

costs and benefits of non-tariff measures in agri-food trade. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1747107

Boyko, N., Nes, K., & Schaefer, K. A. (2024). International trade and Ukraine’s pursuit of self-determination. The World Economy, 47(4), 1460–1477. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/twec.13493

Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). (2025). Trade liberalizing efforts in other countries contradict U.S. Policies. https://www.csis.org/analysis/trade-liberalizing-efforts-other-countries-contradict-us-policies

De Castro, A. B. R., & Kornher, L. (2023). The effect of trade and customs digitalization on agrifood trade: A gravity approach. Q Open, 3(1), Article qoac037. https://academic.oup.com/qopen/article/3/1/qoac037/6961069

Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety (DG SANTE). (2025, February 20). 2024 Annual SPS activity report published. European Commission. https://food.ec.europa.eu/food-safety-news-0/2024-annual-sps-activityreport-published-2025-02-20_en

Duval, Y., & Utoktham, C. (2025, January). Impact of trade facilitation, digitalization and sector-specific measures on agricultural trade. ESCAP Trade, Investment and Innovation Division. https://repository.unescap.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/53592426-9494-4b0d-b855-30fd647cbf5f/content

EPing SPS&TBT Platform. (n. d.-a). Search notifications. WTO.https://eping.wto.org/en/Search/Index?domainIds=1&countryIds=U918&distributionDateFrom=2023-08-01

EPing SPS&TBT Platform. (n. d. -b). Search trade concerns. WTO. https://epingalert.org/en/Search/TradeConcerns

European Commission. (2025). EU trade relationships by country/region. Countries and Regions. Ukraine. https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/eu-traderelationships-country-and-region/countries-and-regions/ukraine_en

Farris, J., Morgan, S., & Beckman, J. (2024, May). Evaluating the effects of nontariff measures on poultry trade (Economic Research Report Number 332). USDA Economic Research Service. https://ers.usda.gov/sites/default/files/_laserfiche/publications/109117/ERR-332.pdf

Fell, J., & Duver, A. (2024). Non-tariff measures: A methodology for the quantification of bilateral trade effects of policy measures at a product level. Applied Economics, 56(36), 4374–4388. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2023.2211336

Ghodsi, M., Gruebler, J., & Stehrer, R. (2016, September). Estimating importer specific ad valorem equivalents of non-tariff measures (Working Paper 129). Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies. https://www.wiiw.ac.at/estimating-importer-specific-ad-valorem-equivalentsof-non-tariff-measures-dlp-3971.pdf

International Trade Centre. (n. d.). Trade map: Trade statistics for international business development. https://www.trademap.org

Larch, M., Shikher, S., & Yotov, Y. V. (2025). Estimating gravity equations: Theory implications, econometric developments, and practical recommendations. Review of International Economics, 33(5), 1066–1092. https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12789

Mabunda, G. P., Nemukondeni, N., & Selaledi, L. (2025). Sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) measures and their implications for international agricultural trade: Challenges and opportunities; comprehensive review. Discover Agriculture, 3, Article 117. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44279-025-00301-9

Malingre, V. (2024, July 4). EU reintroduces tariffs on Ukrainian eggs, oats and sugar. Le Monde. https://www.lemonde.fr/en/economy/article/2024/07/04/eu-taxes-ukrainian-exports-of-eggs-oats-and-sugar_6676616_19.html

Mazorodze, B. T. (2025). The effects of non-tariff measures on agricultural trade efficiency of South Africa within the SADC. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(6), 286. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18060286

Ngoc, N. B., Dang, L. H., Mai, N. T. T., Hong, N. T. T., Huong, D. T. & Ha, T. H. (2024). Heterogeneous trade effects of technical non-tariff measures: Vietnamese agricultural imports. Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, 38(1), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/apel.12406

OECD. (2021, March). Digital opportunities for sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) systems and the trade facilitation effects of SPS electronic certification (OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Paper 152). OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2021/03/digitalopportunities-for-sanitary-and-phytosanitary-sps-systems-and-the-tradefacilitation-effects-of-sps-electronic-certification_c16e752d/cbb7d0f6-en.pdf

OECD. (2023, February). Sanitary and phytosanitary approval procedures: Key issues, their impact on trade, and ways to address them (OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Paper 192). OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2023/02/sanitary-and-phytosanitary-approval-procedures_9f76c681/35c3fd16-en.pdf

Oleinyk, A. M., & Roshko, S. (2023). Analysis of the impact of tariff and non-tariff restrictions on trade relations between the EU and Ukraine. Uzhorod National University Herald. Series: International Economic Relations and World Economy, 49(2023), 100–104. https://doi.org/10.32782/2413-9971/2023-49-18

Ostashko, T., Kobuta, I., Olefir, V., & Lienivova, H. (2022). Evaluation of the results and analysis of the impact of the DCFTA with the EU on agricultural trade in Ukraine. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, 8(4), 86–108. https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2022.08.04.04

Parkhomenko, N., Otenko, I., Martynovych, N., & Otenko, V. (2023). Application of neural networks in prediction of enterprise development in global environment. SCMS Journal of Indian Management, 20(1), 5–19. https://www.scms.edu.in/uploads/journal/Journal%20Jan%20-%20March.pdf

Payne, J., & Trompiz, G. (2025, July 4). EU to cut Ukrainian wheat, sugar imports by 70-80 % under new quotas. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/markets/commodities/eu-raises-import-quotas-ukrainian-wheat-sugar-eu-officialsays-2025-07-04/

RBC-Ukraine. (2025, May 14). EU intends to raise tariffs on imports from Ukraine – FT. https://newsukraine.rbc.ua/news/eu-intends-to-raise-tariffs-on-importsfrom-1747205334.html

Reuters. (2024, April 23). EU lawmakers back Ukraine food import extension, with curbs. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/eu-lawmakers-back-ukrainefood-import-extension-with-curbs-2024-04-23

Sanjuán, A. I., Philippidis, G., Pérez, H. F., & de Rentería, P. G. (2023). Empirical insights on the dynamics of SPS trade costs: The role of regulatory convergence and experience in EU dairy trade. Food Policy, 119, Article 102524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102524

Sobolev, D. (2025, April 18). Grain and feed annual: Ukraine (GAIN Report UP2025-0010). USDA FAS. https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/Report/DownloadReportByFileName?fileName=Grain+and+Feed+Annual_Kyiv_Ukraine_UP2025-0010

Torregrosa, R. J. (2008). Macroeconomic effects of an indirect tax substitution. Journal of Economics, 94, 199–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-008-0003-5

United Nations Statistics Division. (n. d.). UN Comtrade Database. https://comtradeplus.un.org/

World Trade Organization. (n. d. -a). I-TIP goods: Integrated analysis and retrieval of notified non-tariff measure. https://i-tip.wto.org/goods

World Trade Organization. (n. d. -b). Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures. https://notifications.wto.org/en/notification-status/sanitary-and-phytosanitarymeasures

Received: October 22, 2025.

Reviewed: November 3, 2025.

Accepted: November 27, 2025.

Downloads

Published

31.12.2025

How to Cite

BUTENKO, Olena, et al. “THE IMPACT OF NON-TARIFF BARRIERS OF THE EU ON THE EXPORT OF KEY AGRARIAN GOODS OF UKRAINE”. Journal of European Economy, vol. 24, no. 4, Dec. 2025, pp. 579-97, https://jeej.wunu.edu.ua/index.php/enjee/article/view/1890.

Issue

Section

EUROPEAN INTEGRATION