MULTILATERAL REGULATION OF DIGITALIZATION PROCESSES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35774/jee2023.03.455Keywords:
digital economy, digitalization, information and communication technologies, innovations, international organizations, multilateral regulation, world economy.Abstract
The article provides substantiation for the importance of multilateral regulation within the field of digitalization processes. The author has conducted an analysis of the current status, consequences, and shortcomings of liberalising international trade in key ICT products under the WTO’s Information Technology Agreements (ITAs). The combined economic impact of these two ITAs has been estimated at approximately three trillion dollars annually. However, it is important to acknowledge that these agreements encompass fewer than half of the WTO’s member countries. The study reveals that existing international regulation initiatives concerning the digital economy primarily operate on a voluntary basis, focusing on specific aspects of digitalization and involving only a limited number of countries. The author contends that the demand for comprehensive multilateral regulation in digitalization arises from potential global-scale issues and risks. Consequently, the following priorities for multilateral regulation in digitalization are delineated: establishing consensus on fundamental definitions of digital processes, terms of data access, the concept of digital data as a global public good, forms of data management, rights and principles pertaining to digital data, data standardization, and international cooperation in platform management. In conclusion, the author emphasizes the need for an integrated and balanced approach to support the inclusive and sustainable global economic development, as well as the potential for creating an international entity tasked with overseeing various aspects of digitalization.
JEL: F53, O19, O30, O40.
References
Ahmed, U., & Aldonas, G. (2015, January 12). Addressing barriers to digital trade. International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD). World Economic Forum. https://www.wita.org/atp-research/addressingbarriers-digital-trade/
ASEAN. (2023). ASEAN Digital Masterplan 2025. https://asean.org/storage/
ASEAN-Digital-Masterplan-2025.pdf
ASEAN. (2019, January 22). ASEAN Agreement on Electronic Commerce. http://agreement.asean.org/media/download/20190306035048.pdf
Banga, K., & te Velde D. W. (2020). COVID-19 and disruption of the digital economy; evidence from low and middle-income countries (Paper No. 7). Digital Pathways at Oxford Paper Series. https://pathwayscommission.bsg.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2021-01/covid-19_and_disruption_of_the_digital_economy_28jan21.pdf
CBPRs. (n.d.). Participation in the APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System affords Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation members a unique opportunity to work. http://cbprs.org/government/.
Council of Europe. (2018, May 18). Modernised Convention for the Protection of Individuals with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data (CM/Inf(2018)15-final). https://search.coe.int/cm/Pages/result_details.aspx?ObjectId=09000016807c65bf.
Council of Europe. (n.d.). Details of Treaty No. 108. Council of Europe Portal. https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/treaty/108.
Coyle, D., Diepeveen, S., Wdowin, J., Tennison, J., & Kay, L. (2020, February 26). The value of data – Policy implications. Bennett Institute for Public Policy, University of Cambridge. Open Data Institute.https://www.bennettinstitute.cam.ac.uk/publications/value-data-policy-implications/.
Data Protection Africa. (2023, May 19). Africa: AU’s Malabo Convention set to enter force after nine years. https://dataprotection.africa/malabo-conventionset-to-enter-force/ de la Chapelle, B., & Porciuncula, L. (2021, March 31). We need to talk about data:Framing the debate around the free flow of data and data sovereignty. Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network (I&JPN). https://www.internetjurisdiction.net/news/aboutdata-report.
Digital Future Society. (2019). Toward better data governance for all: Data ethics and privacy in the digital era. Digital Future Society. https://digitalfuturesociety.com/app/uploads/2019/08/060819_Toward_better_data_governance_for_all_dfs_mwcapital_DIGITAL.pdf.
ECLAC. (2020, November 26). Digital Agenda for Latin America and the Caribbean (eLAC2022) (LC/CMSI.7/4). Seventh Ministerial Conference on the Information Society in Latin America and the Caribbean, 23-26 November, Santiago. https://repositorio.cepal.org/items/6937119a-33da-439a-ae47-2651d2b13f65
Ezell, S. J. (2012). The benefits of ITA expansion for developing countries. Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF). http://www2.itif.org/2012-benefits-ita-developing-countries.pdf.
Gagnon-Turcotte, S., Sculthorp, M., & Coutts, S. (2021). Digital data partnerships: Building the foundations for collaborative data governance in the public interest. Open North. https://assets.ctfassets.net/e4wa7sgik5wa/6mV2HLHbhKbU2sgtXSTMQX/da0ede46238b1809d60b5ba65732fb2b/Digital_Data_Partnerships_Report-EN.pdf.
Girard, M. (2020). Standards for digital cooperation (CIGI Papers Series No. 237). Centre for International Governance Innovation. https://www.cigionline.org/publications/standards-digitalcooperation/.
Goos, M., Manning, A., & Salomons, A. (2014). Explaining job polarization: Routine-biased technological change and offshoring. American Economic Review, 104(8), 2509–2526. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.8.2509
GovLab. (n.d.). Data Collaboratives Explorer [Interactive Database]. https://datacollaboratives.org/explorer.html?#data-pooling
Gozgor, G., & Lau, C. K. M. (2021). Economic effects of COVID-19 related uncertainty shocks [Editorial]. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 760619. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.760619
Henn, C., & Gnutzmann-Mkrtchyan, A. (2015, February 20). The layers of the IT Agreement’s trade impact (WTO Working Paper ERSD-2015-01). World Trade Organization. https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/reser_e/ersd201501_e.pdf
Hurst, D. (2019, February 2). Japan calls for global consensus on data governance. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2019/02/japan-calls-for-globalconsensus-on-data-governance/
Internet Governance Forum. (2021). The IRPC Charter of Human Rights & Principles for the Internet at 10: Achievements, challenges and what’s next? https://www.intgovforum.org/en/content/the-irpc-charter-of-human-rightsprinciples-for-the-internet-at-10-achievements-challenges.
ITU. (2018). Measuring the information society report 2018. https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-d/opb/ind/D-IND-ICTOI-2018-SUM-PDF-E.pdf
Kanth, D. R. (2019, June 30). India boycotts «Osaka Track» at G20 summit. Mint. https://www.livemint.com/news/world/india-boycotts-osaka-track-at-g20-summit-1561897592466.html
Katz, R. L. (2017). Social and economic impact of digital transformation on the economy. [GSR-17 Discussion Paper]. ITU. https://www.itu.int/en/ITUD/Conferences/GSR/Documents/GSR2017/Soc_Eco_impact_Digital_transformation_finalGSR.pdf
Mozilla Insights. (n.d.). Data for empowerment. Data Futures Lab.https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/data-futures-lab/data-for-empowerment/
Niu, F. (2022). The role of the digital economy in rebuilding and maintaining social governance mechanisms. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 819727.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.819727
OECD. (2019a). Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence
(OECD/LEGAL/0449). OECD Legal Instruments. https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0449
OECD. (2019b). Digitalization and productivity: A story of complementarities. In OECD Economic Outlook 2019 (Issue 1, pp. 55-83). https://www.oecd.org/economy/growth/digitalisation-productivity-and-inclusiveness/.
OECD. (2017, January 17). Key issues for digital transformation in the G20. Report prepared for a joint G20 German Presidency/OECD conference. https://www.oecd.org/g20/key-issues-for-digital-transformation-in-the-g20.pdf
OECD. (2007). OECD Recommendation on Cross-border Co-operation in the Enforcement of Laws Protecting Privacy. https://www.oecd.org/sti/ieconomy/38770483.pdf
OECD & WTO. (2022). Aid for trade at a glance 2022: Promoting trade, inclusiveness and connectivity for sustainable development. https://doi.org/10.1787/9ce2b7ba-en
Sturgeon, T. J. (2021). Upgrading strategies for the digital economy. Global Strategy Journal, 11, 34–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1364
UNCTAD. (2021). Digital economy report 2021. Cross-border data flows and development: For whom the data flow. https://unctad.org/system/files/officialdocument/der2021_en.pdf.
WTO. (n.d.). Information Technology Agreement. https://www.wto.org/english/ tratop_e/inftec_e/inftec_e.htm
WTO. (2015). 20 years of the Information Technology Agreement: Boosting trade,innovation and digital connectivity. https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/ita20years_2017_full_e.pdf
Received: August 4, 2023.
Reviewed: August 8, 2023.
Accepted: August 26, 2023.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
