INSTITUTIONAL CONDITIONALITY OF THE ENDOGENIZATION OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Authors

  • Valeriy Heyets NASU

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35774/jee2018.02.145

Keywords:

State, private institutions, capitalism, liberal reforms, social institutions, social space.

Abstract

At the end of the XXth century, in the countries of the former socialist camp, the capitalist reforms of the fundamental content of the principles of ensuring the right to liberty were carried out, including the economic one, that was realized in accordance with the existence and protection of the rights for a private property. This choice was made because there was a fundamental desire to overcome the dependence on the leadership of the political sovereign, which, in fact, ensured the receipt of «rents» through the implementation of a centralized management system on a planning and distribution basis, restraining the desire to gain freedom by providing opportunities for self-realization. In place of the ideology of the political «sovereign», the new ways of human activity coordination had to come, based on the principles of the ideology of liberalism. At the initial stages of reforms, the problems of institutionalization of activity of both the state and business, remained out of attention, since freedom was «above all».Capitalism, that develops without control and restrictions, is guided by a single criterion - by the private interest of the strongest and remains hostile to any form of public interest of the majority. At the same time, the development of the social institutions requires the formation of an institutional space for the implementation of the civic initiatives and the protection of freedoms from the manifestations of power and the weakly controlled monopoly organized business in the limitation of the civic activity. For this reason, in the process of development of society, the state should establish the long-term social mechanisms not only to consolidate the new spirit of capitalization and further economic growth, but also development through the social mechanisms of the social space that will not break, but will stabilize the society on the basis of the social values.

JEL: O43

Author Biography

Valeriy Heyets, NASU

Director, Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine, Academician of NAS of Ukraine.

References

Martin Van Creveld, (2006).The prosperity and Decay of the State. Moscow: IRISEN

Avineri, S (1972). Hegel's theory of modern state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139171441

Boltanski L., Chiapello, E. (2011). New spirit of capitalism. Moscow: New Literature Review.

Fedorovich, V., Patron, A. P., Zawarukhin. V. P. (2002). USA: federal contract system and economy. Mechanism of regulation [Text] / M.: Science. - 926 p.

Callon, M. (1989).The laws of the markets (Sociological Review Monograph). Oxford: Blackwell.

Boycko, M., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R. W., (1995). Privatizing Russia. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.

Heyets, V. (2017). Osoblyvosti vzayemozvjazku ekonomichnykh ta politychnykh transformatsij na shlyakhu do rekonstruktyvnogo rozvytku ekonomiky Ukrajiny / Economy of Ukraine, № 10. (In Ukrainian).

Asemoglu, D. (2017). Mir, kotoryj unaslyedujut nashi vnuki. Cherez sto lyet vyedushchije ekonomisty predskazyvayut budushcheje. Pod red. Ignacio Palacioc-Uerta; translated from English by Sholomitskaya А., Drobyshevskaya Т. М.: Publishing House named after Haydar, p.18-75. (In Russian).

Williamson, Oliver E. (2000). 'The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead', Journal of Economic Literature, , 38(3): 595-613. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.38.3.595

Heyets, V. M. (2009, p.864). Suspilstvo, derzhava, ekonomika: fenomenologija vzajemodiji ta rozvytku / NAC of Ukraine, DU «Instytut Ekonomiky ta Prognozuvannya NAN Ukrajiny». Kyiv (In Ukrainian).

Heyets, V. M. (2015). Podolannya kvazirynkovosti - shlyakh do investytsijnoorijentovanoji modeli ekonomichnogo zrostannya. Economika Ukrajiny - № 6 (In Ukrainian).

Goldin, I., Kutarin, К. (2016). Epokha Otkrytij.Moscow. Colibri (In Russian).

Oliver E. Williamson, (1985, p. 44-52). Behavioral Assumptions. In: O.E.Williamson. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. N.Y.: The Free Press.

George A. Akerlof, (Aug., 1970).The Market for «Lemons»: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 84, No. 3. (pp. 488-500). https://doi.org/10.2307/1879431

Auzin, О. (2017, p. 142). Ekonomika vsyogo. Jak instytuty vyznachayut' zhyttja. Kyiv, Laurus (In Ukrainian).

Olson, M. (1995, p. 174). Logika kolyektivnykh dejstvij. Obshchestvennyje blaga I teorija grup. Moskwa: FEI. (In Russian).

Heyets, V. (2017). Dovara v ukrajinskykh realijakh prostoru i chasu / Tvorennya prostoru suspil'noji doviry v Ukrajini ХХІ stolittya: materialy mizhnarodnoji naukovo-praktychnoji konferemtsiji, Lviv, 17-19 february 2016 / Asotsiatsija ukrajinskykh bankiv, DVNZ «Universytet Bankivskoji Spravy»; resp. for release S.М. ArzhevitinАржевітін (In Ukrainian).

De Soto Ernando. (2004, p. 272). Zahadka kapitala. Pochemu kapitalizm torzhestvujet na Zapadje I tyerpit porazhenije vo vsem ostal'nom mirye?Moskwa: Olimp-Business (In Russian).

Ukrajinske Suspilstvo (2016): Monitoryng sotsial'nykh zmin. Kyiv: Instytut Sotsiologiji NASN Ukrajiny (In Ukrainian).

Alexander J. (2013) Smysly sotsial'noj zhyzni. Kulturosocilogia. Moskwa: Praxis (In Russian).

Castells, M. (2016). Vlast' komunikatsiji: ucheb. Posobije. Trans. from English by N. M. Tylevych; scient. edit. by A. I. Chernych; nats. Isslyed. Univers. «Vysshaja Shkola Ekonomiki». - М. : Izd. Dom. Vysshej Shkoly Ekonomiki.

Gontmacher, E. Sh., Grishin, I. V., Tsapenko, I. P. (2016). Sotsialnyj kontekst ekonomicheskogo razvitija v XXI veke . Moskwa. (In Russian).

Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon &Schuster, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1145/358916.361990

Published

13.11.2018

How to Cite

Heyets, Valeriy. “INSTITUTIONAL CONDITIONALITY OF THE ENDOGENIZATION OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT”. Journal of European Economy, vol. 17, no. 2, Nov. 2018, pp. 145-56, doi:10.35774/jee2018.02.145.