INNOVATION POLICY THROUGH THE LENS OF ECONOMIC THEORY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35774/jee2022.04.420

Keywords:

Innovations, innovation policy, tools of innovation policy, neoclassical economic theory, institutional economic theory, neo-Schumpeterian economic theory, developmentalist tradition.

Abstract

The paper comprises a comparative analysis of provisions of neoclassical, institutional, neo-Schumpeterian economic theories and the developmental tradition in terms of reasons for and limits to the government interventions into innovation. The theory behind the innovation policy has been improved and systemized in accordance with these economic approaches, creating a firm foundation for scientifically substantiated choices of political tools aimed at solving problems in innovation and eliminating their causes. Research results highlight that any choice of political tools must take into account recommendations of various economic theories and the features of the specific country, i.e., whether it is developed or developing, post-industrial, industrial or agrarian, its culture and history, economic and political circumstances etc. Theoretical arguments serve as the substantiation for proposals on the need to reconceptualize the support network and innovation incentives in Ukraine.

JEL: О30, О31, O38.

Author Biography

Iryna PIDORYCHEVA, Institute of Industrial Economics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv

Dsc (Economics), head of the Sector for Problems of the Innovation and Investment Development in Industry

References

Bazhal, I. (2021). Ukrainian innovation policy: The smart specialization problem [in Ukrainian]. Scientific Papers NaUKMA. Economics, 6(1), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.18523/2519-4739.2021.6.1.8-13

Borrás, S., & Edquist, C. (2013). The choice of innovation policy instruments. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(8), 1513–1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2013.03.002

Buchanan, J. M. (1975). The limits of liberty: Between anarchy and leviathan. University of Chicago Press. https://www.econlib.org/library/Buchanan/buchCv7.html?chapter_num=1#book-reader

Bugge, M., Andersen, A., & Steen, M. (2022). The role of regional innovation systems in mission-oriented innovation policy: exploring the problem-solution space in electrification of maritime transport. European Planning Studies, 30(11), 2312-2333. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2021.1988907

Casula, M. (2022). Implementing the transformative innovation policy in the European Union: How does transformative change occur in member states?. European Planning Studies, 30(11), 2178-2204. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2021.2025345

Edquist, C. (2005). Systems of innovation: technologies, institutions and organizations. Routledge.

Edquist, C. (2019). Towards a holistic innovation policy: Can the Swedish National Innovation Council (NIC) be a role model?. Research Policy, 48(4), 869-879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.008

Fagerberg, J. (2015). Innovation policy, national innovation systems and economic performance: in search of a useful theoretical framework. 2014 EU-SPRI conference, Science and innovation policy: Dynamics, Challenges, Responsibility and Practice. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ 270452701_ Innovation_policy_In_search_of_a_useful_theoretical_framework.

Freeman, C. (1987). Technology policy and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. Frances Pinter.

Hart, D. (2004, Aug 17). On the origins of Google. National Science Foundation. https://beta.nsf.gov/news/origins-google

Hawrylyshyn, B. (2009). To effective societies: Benchmarks for the future. Report to the Roman Club (V. Rubtsov, Ed., 3rd ed.) [in Ukrainian]. University publisher Pulsary.

Hodgson, G. M. (2003). The mystery of the routine. The Darwinian destiny of an evolutionary theory of economic change. Revue économique, 54(2), 355-384. https://doi.org/10.2307/3503007

Isaksen, А, Trippl, M., & Mayer, H. (2022). Regional innovation systems in an era of grand societal challenges: reorientation versus transformation. European Planning Studies, 30(11), 2125-2138. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2022.2084226

Jacobs, L. (2013, Oct 28). GPS, lithium batteries, the internet, cellular technology, airbags: A Q&A about how governments often fuel innovation. TED Blog. https://blog.ted.com/qa-mariana-mazzucato-governments-often-fuel-innovation

Jaffe, A. B. (1998). The importance of «spillovers» in the policy mission of the advanced technology program. Journal of Technology Transfer, 23, 11-19.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02509888

Lalljee, J. (2021, Dec 15). Elon Musk is speaking out against government subsidies. Here’s a list of the billions of dollars his businesses have received. Business Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-listgovernment-subsidies-tesla-billions-spacex-solarcity-2021-12

Lundvall, B.-A. (ed.). (2010). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Anthem Press. https://doi.org/10.7135/UPO9781843318903

Ma, X., Gryshova, I., Khaustova, V., Reshetnyak, O., Shcherbata, M., Bobrovnyk, D., & Khaustov, M. (2022). Assessment of the impact of scientific and technical activities on the economic growth of world countries. Sustainability, 14(21), 14350. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114350

Mazzucato, М. (2018а). Mission-oriented innovation policies: Challenges and opportunities. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(5), 803–815. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty034

Mazzucato, M. (2018b). Mission-oriented research & innovation in the European Union. A problem-solving approach to fuel innovation-led growth. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2777/360325

Monteil, A. (2020, Dec 9). 50 inventions you might not know were funded by the US government. Stacker. https://stacker.com/stories/5483/50-inventionsyou-might-not-know-were-funded-us-government

Nelson, R. R. (ed.). (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. Oxford University Press.

Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.

OECD. (1997). National Innovation Systems. https://www.oecd.org/science/inno/ 2101733.pdf

Omelyanenko, V., Omelianenko, O., & Vernydub, M. (2022). Scientific principles of analytical approach to the formation and assessment of the efficiency of innovation policy in the context of sustainable development [in Ukrainian]. Economy and Society, (42). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2022-42-88

Popovych, O. S. (2019). Scientific, technological, and innovation policy: Main mechanisms of development and implementation (2nd ed.) [in Ukrainian]. Feniks.Research and Development Output of NAS of Ukraine. (2017). Levels of technology. National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. https://www.nas.gov.ua RDOutput/EN/book2017/Pages/trlnav.aspx

Schwartz, G., & Clements, B. (1999). Government subsidies. Journal of Economic Surveys, 13(2), 119-147. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6419.00079

Stoelhorst, J. W. (2005). The naturalist view of universal Darwinism: An application to the evolutionary theory of the firm. In J. Finch & M. Orillard (Eds.), Complexity and the Economy: Implications for Economic Policy (pp. 127- 147). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781845428044

Vyshnevskyi, V. P., & Zbarazskaia, L. A. (eds.). (2013). Industrial policy and management of industrial development in conditions of sustemic disbalances: conceptual bases [in Russian]. Institute of Industrial Economics. https: //iie.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/monografiyi/2013/2013_mono_Vishnevskiy_Zbarazska.pdf

Yehorov, I. Yu. (2017). Innovation support measures in Ukraine: Some legislative and organizational aspects. Science, Technologies, Innovations, 4, 62-70. http://nti.ukrintei.ua/?page_id=1111

Received: November 14, 2022.

Reviewed: November 26, 2022.

Accepted: November 28, 2022.

Published

01.02.2023

How to Cite

PIDORYCHEVA, Iryna. “INNOVATION POLICY THROUGH THE LENS OF ECONOMIC THEORY”. Journal of European Economy, vol. 21, no. 4, Feb. 2023, pp. 420-34, doi:10.35774/jee2022.04.420.