SPECIFICATION AND VERIFICATION OF THE ALTERGLOBALIZATION

Authors

  • Roman Zvarych Ternopil National Economic University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35774/jee2017.01.003

Keywords:

Alterglobalization, ephemeral network, neoliberal model, non-governmental organization, poverty gap, social movement, valorization of diversity.

Abstract

Research is devoted to the analysis of economic diversity of global actors and the process investigation of rethinking social change and social movements in favor of alternative model of global society. The purpose of the research is to analyze alterglobal movements aimed at economic valorization of diversity and elaboration conclusions on the implementation alterglobal model of the world economy. The object of research is the alternative model of world economy development. An evaluation of conflicting relations of the alterglobalization and neoliberal ideology is carried in terms of market self-regulation. The influence of neoliberal ideology on actors is determined; the deprivation of world general alternatives is defined by the global system promotion of market management and government intervention. The process of rethinking social change and social movements is studied particularly in the matter of calling the existing forms of activity; concepts of changes associated with large movements of industrial society. Participation of alterglobal movement is identified in the fight against offshore relocation, economic inequality and social justice. An analysis of valorization of economic diversity is conducted as one of the defining values of alterglobal movement in the aspects of identity, convergence, relevance and alternativeness. The conclusions on the specification and verification of alterglobalization understanding are formulated.

JEL: F02.

Author Biography

Roman Zvarych, Ternopil National Economic University

Candidate of Economic Sciences, Assistant Professor

References

Robertson, R. (2003). The three waves of globalization: a history of a developing global consciousness. London: Zed.

Clarke, Simon (2005). The Neoliberal Theory of Society. Neoliberalism - A Critical Reader. London: Pluto Press. Retrieved from http://homepages.warwick.ac.uk/~syrbe/pubs/Neoliberalism.pdf.

McGrew, A., & Held, D. (2007). Globalization theory: approaches and controversies. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Bell, D., & Inozemtsev, V. L. (2007). The era of disunity: Reflections on the world of the 21st century. Moscow: Center for Post-Industrial Studies.

Friedman, T. L. (2006). The world is flat: The globalized world in the twenty-first century. London: Penguin.

Findlay, R., & O’Rourke, K. H. (2007). Power and plenty: Trade, war, and the world economy in the second millennium. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 408-412; 473-526. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400831883

Pleyers, G. (2013). Alter-globalization: Becoming actors in a global age. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Milliot, E., & Tournois, N. (2010). The paradoxes of globalisation. London-N. Y.: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230303966

Buzgalin, A. (2003). Alter-globalism: Theory and practice of «anti-global movement». Moscow: Editorial.

Cavanagh, J., & Mander, J. (2009). Alternatives to economic globalization: A better world is possible. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

Huntington, S. P. (2002). The clash of civilizations and the remarking of world order. London: The Free Press.

Yip, G. S., & Hult, G. T. (2012). Total global strategy. Boston: Pearson.

Published

05.09.2019

How to Cite

Zvarych, Roman. “SPECIFICATION AND VERIFICATION OF THE ALTERGLOBALIZATION”. Journal of European Economy, vol. 16, no. 1, Sept. 2019, pp. 3-14, doi:10.35774/jee2017.01.003.