PROSPECT THEORY AND TAX COMPLIANCE: A MICROFOUNDED EQUILIBRIUM PERSPECTIVE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35774/jee2019.02.177Keywords:
Tax evasion, fiscal policy, prospect theory.Abstract
This paper discusses the capabilities of a class of microfounded equilibrium models, augmented with Prospect Theory elements in the spirit of al- Nowaihi and Dhami (2007), to address several open questions in the analysis of tax evasion and compliance decisions. There are three main results: i) there exists a unique equilibrium with a tax evasion, consistent with the empirical estimates for the United States economy; ii) the model predicts a positive relationship between tax rate and evasion rate, while offering a solution to the so called Yitzhaki puzzle; iii) the «framing effect» plays a significant role in supporting these results; this is a distinctive characterstic of this class of model, typically not present in simple individual choice models. Furthermore, the model also allows us to investigate some potentially relevant effects of labor supply behavior on the tax compliance decisions.
JEL: E21; D03; D81; H03.
References
Allingham, M.G., Sandmo, A. 1972. Income tax evasion: a theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 1, 238-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(72)90010-2
Alm, J., McClelland, G.H., Schulze, W.D. 1992. Why do people pay taxes? Journal of Public Economics, 48, 21-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(92)90040-M
Andreoni, J., Erard, B., Feinstein, J. 1998. Tax Compliance. Journal of Economic Literature, 36, 818-860.
Arcand, J., Rota Graziosi, G. 2005. Tax Compliance and Rank Dependent Expected Utility. The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, 30, 57-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10836-005-1108-1
Barberis, N. Huang, M. 2009.Preferences with frames: A new utility specification that allows for the framing of risks. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 33, 1555-1576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2009.01.009
Barberis, N. Huang, M., Santos, T. 2001. Prospect Theory and Asset Prices, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 1-53. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355301556310
Bénassy, J. P., 1999. Analytical solutions to a structural signal extraction model: Lucas 1972 revisited. Journal of Monetary Economics 44, 509-521. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3932(99)00030-6
Bernasconi, M. 1998. Tax evasion and orders of risk aversion. Journal of Public Economics, 67, 123-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(97)00051-0
Bernasconi, M., Zanardi, A. 2004. Tax evasion, tax rates and reference dependence. FinanzArchiv, 60, 422-445. https://doi.org/10.1628/0015221042396122
Ciccarone, G., Marchetti, E. 2013. Rational expectations and loss aversion: potential output and welfare implications. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 86, 24-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2012.12.032
Cullis, J., Jones, P., Savoia, A., 2012. Social norms and tax compliance: Framing the decision to pay tax. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 41, 159-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2011.12.003
Dhami, S., al-Nowaihi A. 2007. Why do people pay taxes? Prospect theory versus expected utility theory. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 64, 171-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2006.08.006
Hashimdaze, N., Myles, G., Tran-Nam, B. 2013. Applications of behavioural economics to tax evasion. Journal of Economic Surveys, 27, 941-977. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2012.00733.x
Kahneman, D. 2003. Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics, American Economic Review, 93, 1449-75. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803322655392
Kahneman, D., Lovallo, D. 1993. Timid Choices and Bold Forecasts: A Cognitive Perspective on Risk Taking. Management Science, 39, 17-31. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.39.1.17
Kimball, M., Shapiro, M. 2008. Labor Supply: Are the Income and Substitution Effects Both Large or Small? NBER Working Paper No. 14208. https://doi.org/10.3386/w14208
Lucas, R., 1972. Expectations and the neutrality of money. Journal of Economic Theory 4, 103-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(72)90142-1
Prelec, D. 1998. The probability weighting function, Econometrica, 60, 497-528. https://doi.org/10.2307/2998573
Rabin, M. 2013. An approach to incorporating psychology into economics. American Economic Review, 103, 617-22. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.3.617
Rablen, M.D. 2010. A reference-dependent model of tax evasion and exchange equity. Public Finance Review, 38, 282-305. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142110367858
Schneider, F., Enste, D. 2000. Shadow Economies: Size, Causes and Consequences. Journal of Economic Literature, 38, 77-114. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.38.1.77
Schneider, F. Buhen, A. Montenegro, C. 2010. New estimates for the shadow economies all over the world, International. Economic Journal, 24, 443-461. https://doi.org/10.1080/10168737.2010.525974
Torgler, B. 2007. Tax Compliance and Tax Morale: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847207203
Tversky, A., Kahneman, D. 1992. Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297-323. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122574
Yaniv, G. 1999. Tax compliance and advance tax payments: a prospect theory analysis. National Tax Journal, 52, 753-764.
Yitzhaki, S. 1974. A note on income tax evasion: a theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 3, 201-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(74)90037-1
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
