DE-FACTO INTEGRATION OF EAST ASIA COMPARED

Authors

  • Kiyoshi Abe

Keywords:

Economic integration, Japanese MNCsSMEs, FDI, East Asian Economy, Southeas Asian Economy, ASEAN, Japanese companies in Germany and the USA, ELI.

Abstract

Despite many barriers, there has been a rise of intra-East-Asia trade. Japanese multinational companies are significant promoters of the de-facto integration, enhancing local procurements and orchestrating the mutual-supply network throughout East Asia. All that a Southeast Asian country needs to do is to plug in the intricate rise of intra-East-Asia trade. Japanese multinational companies are significant promoters of the de-facto integration, enhancing local procurements and orchestrating the mutual-supply network throughout East Asia. All that a Southeast Asian country needs to do is to plug in the intricate production network led by the MNC. Market dynamics functions well in East Asia, whereas political decisions prevail in the ELI. When Japanese MNCs relocate, so does their vertical relationship. Many informal business relationships are active and interwoven in East Asia unlike the ELI.

References

Abe (1993), Kiyoshi, «European and Japanese Direct Investments in Alabama», Atlantic Economic Society Best Papers Proceedings, Vol. 3, No.2, July 1993.

Ahn (2000), Choong Yong, «Newly Emerging Economic Integration in Northeast Asia: Challenges and Prospects», presented at the 59th Conference of the Japan Society of International Economics, Hitotsubashi University, Japan, Oct. 2000.

Aoki (2000), Takeshi, ASIAN ECONOMY: PATH TO SUSTAINABLE GROWTH (in Japanese), Nihon Hyohronsha.

Bergsten (2000), C. Fred, «The New Asian Challenge», Working Paper 00-4 March 2000, Institute for International Economics.

Borrus (1997) Michael, «Left for Dead: Asian Production Networks and the Revival of US Electronics», BRIE Working Paper #100, April.

Capannelli (1997), Giovanni, «Industrywide Relocation and Technology Transfer by Japanese Electronic Firms—A Case Study on Buyer-Supplier Relations in Malaysia», Ph. D. Dissertation, Hitotsubashi University, November.

Chen (1993), Edward K.Y., «Economic Restructuring and Industrial Development», BUSINESS AND THE CONTEMPORARY WORLD, Spring 1993.

Ernst (1997), Dieter, «From Partial to Systemic Globalization: International Production Networks in the Electronics Industry», April, BRIE Working Paper #98, Graduate School of International Relations and Pacific Studies, University of California at San Diego.

Kim (1997), Youngsoo, Technological Capabilities and Samsung Electronics’ International Production Network in Asia’, BRIE Working Paper #106, November.

Nomura Research Institute (NRI) (1999), «Survey of Japanese, US and German Companies in Asia», January.

Ravenhill (1995), John, «The Regionalization of Production and Competitiveness in East Asia», Department of International Relations, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.

Sander (1995), «Deep Integration, Shallow Regionalism, and Strategic Openness: Three Notes on Economic Integration in East Asia», in Renate Ohr and Franz Peter Lang (Eds.), INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC INTEGRATION, Studies in Contemporary Economics, Physica-Verlag.

Weidenbaum (1996), Murray, and Hughes, Samuel, The Bamboo Network: How Expatriate Chinese Entrepreneurs Are Creating a New Economic Superpower in Asia, New York: The Free Press.

Zysman (1995), John, and Dohery, Eileen, «The Evolving Role of the State in Asian Industrialization», BRIE Working Paper #84, November.

Published

16.05.2018

How to Cite

Abe, Kiyoshi. “DE-FACTO INTEGRATION OF EAST ASIA COMPARED”. Journal of European Economy, vol. 1, no. 1, May 2018, pp. 78-94, https://jeej.wunu.edu.ua/index.php/enjee/article/view/1260.