REASONS FOR INSUFFICIENT INNOVATION IN THE POLISH ECONOMY
Keywords:
Innovations, innovation processes, economic activity, social, educational and infrastructural mechanisms, innovativeness.Abstract
In spite of the innovation’s permanent place in economics, it deserves a new look. Consequently, the level of innovativeness is the responsibility of the individual, the economic agent. The aim of the paper is to reflect on searches for answers to numerous questions touching on how? How can influence be exerted on individual’s level of innovativeness without being in conflict with natural processes to which he as a subject is subordinated? How can we arrive at such a situation where everyone, irrespective of position held or social and professional role played, would want, know and be able to undertake effective realization of innovative activity, taking advantage of the knowledge he possesses for beneficial purposes. How to achieve a given level of management of the individual’s innovativeness, which would guarantee an increase in corporate innovativeness, including the economy as a whole? How to merge marketing mechanisms with the facilitating role of the state in innovation management, so that they could satisfy demands of the globalizing economy that is based on knowledge and human capital?
References
U. Beck, A. Giddens, S. Lash, Reflective modernisation, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1994.
Schumpeter Joseph, Teoria rozwoju gospodarczego, Warszawa: PWN, 1960 [The Theory of Economic Development, Cambridge: Harward University Press, 1934 (1912)].
Mansfield Edwin, The Economic of Technological Innovation, New York: Norton, 1968.
Solow Robert M., «Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function», Review of Economics and Statistics, 1956, Vol. 39.
M. Horx, Die acht Sphären der Zukunft, Wien-München 2002.
U.Beck, A. Giddens, S. Lash, Reflective modernisation, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1994.
Drucker Peter F., Innowacje і przedsiqbiorczosc. Praktyka і zasady, Warszawa: PWE, 1992 [Innovation and Enterpreneurship. Praktice and Principles, New York: Harper & Row, 1985].
Drucker Peter F., Frontiers of Management, New York: Harper & Row, 1954.
A New Economy? The Changing Role of Innovation and Information Technology in Growth, Paris: OECD 2000.
Römer Paul, «Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth», Journal of Political Economy 1986, No. 94, pp. 1002-1037.
Drucker Peter F., Spoleczehstwo postkapitalistyczne, Warszawa: Wyd. Naukowe PWN, 1999 [The Post-Capitalist Society, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 1993].
Stiglitz Joseph E., Knowledge for Development. Economic Science, Washington: The World Bank, 1999
Kwasnicki Witold, Knowledge, Innovation and Economy. An Evolutionary Exploration, Cheltenham, UK, Brookfield, US: Edward Elgar Publishing, 1996.
Schumacher Ernst F., Male jest piqkne, Warszawa, Panstwowy Instytut Wydawniczy, 1981 [Small is Beautiful, Published by Abacus, 1974].
Thurow Lester C., Przysziosc kapitalizmu, Wyd. Dolnoslqskie, Wroclaw 1999 [The Future of Capitalism, New York: William Morrow & Company, 1996].
Knowledge Management in the Learning Society, Centre for Educational Research and Innovation, Paris: OECD, 2000.
Handy Charles, Wiek paradoksu, W poszukiwaniu sensu przyszfosci, Warszawa: Dom Wydawniczy ABC, 1996 [The Empty Raincoat. Making Sense of the Future, New York: HBS Press, 1994].
Dobija Dorota, Pomiar і sprawozdawczosc kapitalu intelektualnego przedsiqbiorstwa, Warszawa: Wyzsza Szkota Przedsi^biorczosci і Zarzqdzania im. Leona Kuzminskiego, 2003.
Brooking Annie, Intellectual Capital, London: Thomas Business Press, 1996.
Edvinsson Leif, Melone Michael S., Kapital intelektualny, Wyd. Naukowe PWN, 2001 [Intellectual Capital, New York: Harper Business, 1997].
Brennan Niamh, Connell Brenda, «Intellectual capital: current issues and policy implications», Journal of Intellectual Capital 2000, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 206-240.
Sliwa Kazimierz R., О organizacjach inteligentnych і rozwiqzywaniu zfozonych problemow zarzqdzania nimi, Warszawa: Wyzsza Szkota Menedzerska, 2001.
Nonaka Ikujiro, Takeuchi Hirotaka, Kreowanie wiedzy w organizacji. Jak spolki japohskie dynamizujq procesy innowacyjne, Warszawa, Poltext, 2000 [ The Knowledge-Creating Company. How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamic of Innovation, New York: Oxford University Press, 1995].
Polska w drodze do globalnego spoleczehstwa informacyjnego, Raport о rozwoju spotecznym, Warszawa: UNDP, 2002.
Gospodarka oparta na wiedzy. Wyzwania dla Polski XXI wieku, Kuklinski Antoni (red.), Warszawa: Komitet Badan Naukowych, 2001
Drucker, Spoieczehstwo postkomunistyczne, s. 22.
Kleer Jerzy, «Czym jest GOW», w: Gospodarka oparta na wiedzy. Perspektywy Banku Swiatowego, Kuklinski Antoni (red.), Warszawa: Biuro Banku Swiatowego w Polsce, Komitet Badan Naukowych, 2003, pp. 297-302.
ePolska. Plan dziafah na rzecz rozwoju spoleczehstwa informacyjnego w Polsce na lata 2001-2006, Warszawa: Ministerstwo Gospodarki, 2000.
Procesy innowacyjne w polskiej gospodarce, Raport 26, Warszawa: Rada Strategii Spoteczno-Gospodarczej, 2005, s. 96.
Janasz Wtadystaw, «Innowacyjnosc polskich przedsi^biorstw przemystowych», w: Innowacje w rozwoju przedsiq biorczos с і w procesie transformacji, Janasz Wtadystaw (red.), Warszawa: Difin, 2004.
Procesy innowacyjne wpolskiej gospodarce, s. 100.
Sosnowska Alicja, «Obraz innowacyjnosci polskich przedsi^biorstw wedtug publikowanych zrodet», w: Sosnowska Alicja і in., Zarzqdzanie firmq innowacyjnq, Warszawa: Difin, 2000.
Rogers E.M., Diffusion of Innovations, 3rd ed., New York: The Free Press, 1983.
Drucker, Innowacje і przedsiqbiorczosc, s. 43.
Matematyczne modele procesöw dyfuzji innowacji, Zaqc Kazimierz (red.), Warszawa: Wyd. Naukowe PWN, 1993.
Sen Amartya, Commodities and capabilities, Amsterdam and New York: North-Holland, 1985.
Offer Avner, «Economic Wellfare Measurements and Human Well-Being», University of Oxford, Discussion Papers in Economic and Social History 2000,no.34.
Rybak Mirostawa, Etyka menedzera. Spoleczna odpowiedzialnosc przedsiqbiorstwa, Warszawa: Wyd. Naukowe PWN, 2004
Promoting a European framework for Corporate Social Responsibility, Green Paper, Brussels, European Commission, 2001.
VZkrqgu filozofii Romana Ingardena, Strozewski W., W^grzecki Adam (red.), Warszawa, Krakow: PWN, 1995
Poprzeczko J., Podmiotowosc czfowieka і spoieczenstwa, Warszawa: PWN, 1988
Cooper Robert K., Sawaf Ayman, Inteligencja emocjonalna w organizacji і zarzqdzaniu, Wyd. Studio ЕМКА, Warszawa 2000.
Kozielecki Jozef, «The role of hubristic motivation in transgressive behavior», New Idea in Psychology 1987, No. 3.
Kozielecki Jozef, О czfowieku wielowymiarowym, Warszawa: PWN, 1988.
Marciniak Stefan, «Innowacyjnosc gospodarki a panstwo», w: Zmiany instytucjonalne w polskiej gospodarce rynkowej, Nog a Adam (red), Warszawa: PTE, 2004.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
