SOCIETY 4.0: GENERAL ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35774/jee2023.02.146

Keywords:

Society 4.0, Industry 4.0, digitalization, technology, Society 5.0.

Abstract

The term «Society 4.0» is used to define a group of people in advanced economies who form a modern cultural society, which is heavily influenced by technological developments and digitalization and having a significant impact on most aspects of human life. The notion of Society 4.0 is closely related to and factually corresponds with the Fourth Industrial Revolution, which is also referred to as «Industry 4.0» and widely debated. Despite its topicality, this concept has not received as much publishing attention as anticipated. Surprisingly, the term «Society 5.0», which describes what the current society will gradually transform into in the near future, receives much more focus in this context. The aim of this article is to present the concept of Society 4.0 in its factual form and to identify its general exogenous and endogenous implications, in particular in the sphere of economics.

JEL: O14, O30, P00.

Author Biographies

Kamila TUREČKOVÁ, Silesian University in Opava

doc. Ing. Ph.D. MBA, Department of Economics and Public Administration

Jan NEVIMA, Silesian University in Opava

doc. Ing. Ph.D. MBA, Department of Economics and Public Administration

Anna VAŇOVÁ, Matej Bel University, Banská Bystrica

doc. Ing. PhD., Department of Public Economics and Regional Development

Katarína VITÁLIŠOVÁ, Matej Bel University, Banská Bystrica

doc. Ing. PhD., Department of Public Economics and Regional Development

References

Čada, R., Frydýšek, K., Sejda, F., & Tiller. P. (2018). Evaluation of locking bone screw heads. In C. Fischer & J. Náprstek (Eds.), Proceedings of 24th International Conference on Engineering Mechanics (pp. 133-136). Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics of the Czech Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/ 10.21495/91-8-133

Čada, R., & Pektor, T. (2021). Development of a low-cost drawing tool for a press brake. In Proceedings of the 30th Anniversary International Conference on Metallurgy and Materials (pp. 241-246). Tanger Ltd. https://doi.org/10.37904/metal.2021.4117

Castells, M. (1997). The information age: Economy, society and culture. Volume II: The power of identity. Blackwell. European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. (2013). Factories of the future – Multi-annual roadmap for the contractual PPP under Horizon 2020. Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/29815

Ferreira, A. C. D. A., Titotto, S. L. M. C., & Akkari, A. C. S. (2022). Urban agriculture 5.0: An exploratory approach to the food system in a super smart society. International Journal of Mathematical, Engineering and Management Sciences, 7(4), 455-475. https://doi.org/10.33889/IJMEMS.2022.7.4.030

Fukuyama, M. (2018). Society 5.0: Aiming for a new human-centered society. Japan Spotlight, July–August, 47-50. https://www.jef.or.jp/journal/pdf/220th_Special_Article_02.pdf

Gladden, M. E. (2019). Who will be the members of society 5.0? Towards an anthropology of technologically posthumanized future societies. Social Sciences, 8(5), 148. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8050148

Harayama, Y. (2017). Society 5.0: Aiming for a new human-centered society. Japan’s science and technology policies for addressing global social challenges. Hitachi Review, 66(6), 554-559. http://www.hitachi.com/rev/ archive/2017/r2017_06/trends/index.html

Helbing, D. (2016). Society 4.0: Upgrading society, but how?. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304352735_Society_40_Upgrading_society_but_how

Huws, U. (2016). Platform labour: Sharing economy or virtual wild West? Journal for a Progressive Economy, 7. http://www.progressiveeconomy.eu/ content/platform-labour-sharing-economy-or-virtual-wildiDNES.cz. (2022): Průmysl 5.0. https://www.idnes.cz/magaziny/specialy/prumysl5-0.A221104_114741_magazin-special2r_pecve

MacGregor Pelikánová, R., MacGregor, R. K., & ČEernek, M. (2021). New trends in codes of ethics: Czech business ethics preferences by the dawn of COVID-19. Oeconomia Copernicana, 12(4), 973–1009. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2021.032

MacGregor Pelikánová, R., & Hála, M. (2021). CSR unconscious consumption by generation Z in the COVID-19 era – Responsible heretics not paying CSR bonus? Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(8), 390.https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14080390

MacGregor Pelikánová, R., & Rubáček, F. (2022). Taxonomy for transparency in non-financial statements – clear duty with unclear sanction. Danube, 13(3), 173-195. https://doi.org/10.2478/danb-2022-0011.

Mazali, T. (2018). From industry 4.0 to society 4.0, there and back. AI & Society, 33, 405–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-017-0792-6

Papa, R. (2015). Editorial preface. Cities, energy and climate change. TeMA Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 8(1), 3-4.

Potocan, V., Mulej, M., & Nedelko, Z. (2021). Society 5.0: Balancing of Industry 4.0, economic advancement and social problems. Kybernetes, 50(3), 794-811. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-12-2019-0858

Salimova, T., Vukovic, N., & Guskova, N. (2020). Towards sustainability through Industry 4.0 and Society 5.0. International Review, 3-4, 48-54. https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/2217-9739/2020/2217-97392003048S.pdf

Schindlerová, V., & Šajdlerová, I. (2019). Use of the dynamic simulation to reduce handling complexity in the manufacturing process. Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal, 14(1), 81-88. https://doi.org/10.12913/22998624/113616

Schindlerová, V., & Šajdlerová, I. (2021). Comparison of basic maintenance concepts using Witness. MM Science Journal, December, 5435-5440. https://doi.org/10.17973/MMSJ.2021_12_2021114

Staníčková, M., & Melecký, L. (2014). Factors determining driving forces of competitiveness in EU countries. In Double-blind peer-reviewed proceedings part V. of the International Scientific Conference Hradec Economic Days 2014: Vol.4(2) (pp. 338-348). University of Hradec Králové.

Thilagavathi, R., Viswanath, J., Čepová, L., & Schindlerová, V. (2022). Effect of inflation and permitted three-slot payment on two-warehouse inventory system with stock-dependent demand and partial backlogging. Mathematics, 10(21), 3943. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10213943

Turečková, K. (2014). Quaternary sector as a source of growth and competitiveness in the EU. In I. Honová (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on European Integration 2014 (pp. 723-730). VŠB – TechnicalUniversity of Ostrava.

Vale, L. J. (2014). The politics of resilient cities: Whose resilience and whose city? Building Research & Information, 42(2), 191-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2014.850602

Vaňová, A. (2021). Trends in city development [in Slovakian]. Vydavateľstvo Univerzity Mateja Bela – Belianum.

Vitálišová, K., Sýkorová, K., Koróny, S., Laco, P., Vaňová, A., & Borseková, K. (2023). Digital transformation in local municipalities: Theory versus practice. In G. Rouet & T. Côme (Eds.), Participatory and digital democracy at the local level (pp.207-226). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20943-7_13

Zakri, A. H. (2018, Oct 15). Japan’s «Society 5.0». New Straits Times. https://www.nst.com.my/opinion/columnists/2018/10/421551/japans-society-50

Received: March 29, 2023.

Reviewed: April 17, 2023.

Accepted: April 19, 2023.

Published

13.07.2023

How to Cite

TUREČKOVÁ, Kamila, et al. “SOCIETY 4.0: GENERAL ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS”. Journal of European Economy, vol. 22, no. 2, July 2023, pp. 146-57, doi:10.35774/jee2023.02.146.

Most read articles by the same author(s)