The problem of economic convergence of Ukraine is considered as a crucial way of reaching the goal of European integration and membership in the European Union. It takes into account the current economic situation in the country, the main feature of which is a significant lag behind all EU Member States, especially in terms of GDP per capita. The external factor is crucial in the concept because of the inability to singlehandedly accomplish convergence tasks in Europe and in the global space in a reasonable timeframe. The more substantial the changes, the more important the factors related to the development of international economic relations. The author’s proposals concentrate on making economic convergence central in the development of overall convergence. Ukraine has great potential for mutually beneficial cooperation in all spheres with the Visegrad Four because it is a union of neighbouring countries and has gained experience reducing a relatively large economic lag from the «old» EU members. The scope of the investigation is not limited to traditional forms of international cooperation, but is oriented towards new solutions. They are represented by the organizational model «V4 + UA» (Visegrad Four + Ukraine) with the prospect of developing into an enlarged association «Visegrad Five», which will continue to play the role of the internal structure of the European Union, and include a candidate for membership, i.e. Ukraine. Sustainable economic growth of a new group must rely on a unified market, Europe’s greatest advantage, and concentrated structural reforms that can drive the production in the areas of growing demand. The author also admits the possibility of future establishment of confederate government in the model «V4 + UA» in order to use the competitive advantages of large state entities such as Germany, France, Italy, Spain).

JEL: F15, F22, F43, J11, J61.

Ключові слова

Visegrad Five; Visegrad Four; diaspora; welfare; Europe’s convergence machine; European Union; convergence; national convergence machine; labour migration; EU membership.

Повний текст:



Belorus, О., Vlasov, V., Hrytsenko, А. (2018). Global convergence-network financial economy: a monograph. Saarbrucken: LAP Lamden Academic Publishing, 632.

Belorus, О. (2015). Neo-convergence of socio-economic systems in the face of global challenges. Annual Journal of the Diplomatic Academy of Ukraine, 22 (3), 54-61.

Burlai, Т. (2019). Socio-economic convergence: theory and practice: Monograph. Kyiv, NAS of Ukraine; Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine, 364.

State Statistics Service of Ukraine. (2017). Labour emigration of the population (according to the results of the modular sampling survey). Kyiv, 8

«Society and Environment» Resource & Analysis Center. (2019). Eurointegration as a goal. Kyiv. URL:

Yevropeiska Pravda. (2019). 59% of Ukrainians are in favor of joining the EU - polls. URL:

Macroeconomics-2: textbook. (2010). Growth in the process of economic convergence. Model of E. Gundlach. Kyiv, Kamianets-Podilskyi: Aksioma, 424, 252-273.

Kovalenko, Ye. (2008). Conceptual and methodological foundations of eurointegration policy. Humanities Bulletin of Zaporizhzhe State Engineering Academy, 32. URL:

Lukianenko, D., Chuzhykov, V., Vozhniak, M. (2010). Convergence of economic models of Poland and Ukraine: monograph. Kyiv, KNEU

Kostenko, А. (2018). Information and communication strategies of European integration in Ukraine. Almanac «Grani», 21, 11, 70-77. URL: file:///C:/Users/Sav/Desktop/1284-Article%20Text-2375-1-10-20190110.pdf

Sidenko, V. (2018). Reformatting European Integration: Opportunities and Risks for the EU-Ukraine Association. Kyiv, Zapovit, 214. URL: _intehratsii.pdf

Redchenko K. (2008). The influence of stakeholder theory on management accounting. Economy of Industry, 4, 60. URL:

Savelyev, Ye., Kuryliak, V., Kuryliak, M. (2019). The Visegrad Four and Ukraine in the Context of the Development of European Integration Processes. Economic Herald of the Donbass, 3, 25

Sirenko, K. (2018). European integration policy of Ukraine: positive and negative aspects. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod University, 22, 3. URL:

Slabykh D. (n.d.) Theoretical and methodological approaches to integration processes in Europe. URL: file:///C:/Users/Sav/Desktop/apdyo_2011_3_13.pdf

Sokur О. (2015). European integration: theoretical background and evolution of views. Topical Policy Issues, 55. 2015. URL:

Stelmashchuk, А. (2016). Intrinsic characteristics, prerequisites and principles of cross-border convergence between Ukraine and the EU. Innovative Economy, 7-8 (64), 10. URL:

Shcherbakova Yu. (2013). The values of a united Europe. Monograf. Kyiv, Publishing Centre «Academy». URL:

Alcidi, C. (2019). Economic Integration and Income Convergence in the EU. Intereconomics. Review of European Economic Policy, 54, 1, 5. URL:

Aslam A., Giang Ho J., Osorio-Buitron C., Piazza R. (2019). Globalization Helps Spread Knowledge and Technology across Borders. IMFBlog. URL:

Cinzia, A., Bodewig, Ch., Preissl, B.(2018). Econonic convergence or divergence in the EU? CEPS. URL:

Alcidi C., Bodewig Ch., Preissl B. (2018). Economic convergence or divergence in the EU? CEPS. URL:

Georgieva K. (2019). The Adaptive Age. IMFBlog. URL:

Karver J., Inchauste G. (2017). Perceptions of Welfare in the European Union. Beground to «Growing United: Upgrading Europe's Convergences Machine». World Bank Group, 3. URL:;

Levy, S., and M. Walton. (2005). No Growth without Equity: Inequality, Interests and Competition in Mexico. London: Palgrave Macmillan. URL:

Fouéré E. (2019). Macron's «non» to EU enlargement. URL:

World Bank Group. (2017). World Development Report 2017: Governance and the Law. Washington, DC: World Bank. URL:



  • Поки немає зовнішніх посилань.