TRANSPARENCY OF MARKET STATUSNESS OF ENVIROMENTAL DIPLOMACY

Alina Bokhan

doi:10.35774/jee2017.04.481

Authors

Alina Bokhan Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35774/jee2017.04.481

Keywords:

Environmental diplomacy, transparency, information security, international economic relations, communicative activity, market statusness, «soft power», global partnership, progress

Abstract

The article deals with the topical issues of the formation of market status-ness of environmental diplomacy in the context of identifying its transparency features in the field of international economic relations, communicative mobility development and interactive dialogue, information security and global partnership between countries. The international aspect of transparency may be presented in modulation of different countries interests, integration associations, international institutions, non-governmental organizations, corporations, business and social movements. International cooperation requires new initiatives, mutual understanding, consolidation and engagement of diplomacy forces of environmental assistance. The specificity of diplomacy information support involves the approval of safety imperatives, environmental compatibility, reclusiveness and prognostics in applying convergent technologies. Conducting of complex analysis with regard to openness, intensity and capacity of environmental diplomacy agents to publicity is specified by new trends and counter-trends in the flows ofnformation arrays and imitation influences. It is proved that present day content of environmental diplomacy acquires approbation in the market, international recognition and public support.

JEL: E61, F20, F42, Q28.

Author Biography

Alina Bokhan, Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics

PhD in Economics, Associate Professor

References

Blaxekjær L. Ø. (2016). «New Practices and Narratives of Environmental Diplomacy». Retrieved from: http://www.e-ir.inf.

Cooper, A. F. (2013). «The Changing Nature of Diplomacy». Retrieved from: http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199588862.013.0002

Dorsey, K. (2014). «Crossing Boundaries: The Environment in International Relations». Retrieved from: http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com.

Hruschynska, N. (2016). «Economic diplomacy as a powerful tool to overcome the conflict in the country», Nobel Economic Bulletin, vol. 1 (9), pp. 85-89.

Kondratenko, G. (2016). «Environmental diplomacy of the countries of NorthEast Asia», The news on the Eastern, vol. 2(30), pp. 47-64.

Mazaraki, A. (2010). «Economic security of Ukraine in conditions of globalization challenges», Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics, Kyiv, Ukraine, 718 p.

Rogozhina, N. (2013). «Global environmental security: the position of the developing countries», World economy and international relations, vol. 2, pp. 3-11.

Rootes, C., Nulman, E. (2015), «The Impacts of Environmental Movements», URL: http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com.

Shevchenko, I. (2016). «Strategic Environmental Assessment as environmental policy instruments Ukraine», Ukraine's economy, vol. 10, pp. 79-88.

Tsіvatyi, V. (2016). «Environmental Diplomacy on the Chernobyl disaster: Institutional and International Political Cooperation Context», Scientific Bulletin of Diplomatic Academy of Ukraine, ser. «Political science», vol. 23, no. II, pp. 128-134.

Vris, I. A. (2016). «Mediation of current politics and diplomacy and the challenges of new media: French format and institutional dialogue of the XXI century», Foreign affairs, vol. 1, pp. 37-41.

Deri, Zh. V. (2016). «Environmental component of corporate social responsibility: world experience and Ukrainian realities», Current problems of the economy, vol.11, pp. 278-290.

Kret, O. (2010). «Institutionalization of transparency of state power»: author's abstract. Sciences: special 23.00.02; Cherniv nats Un-t them. Yu Fedkovich, Chernivtsi, 20 p.

Makogonyuk, Yu. (2015). «Ecological sphere as a sphere of development of information society: conceptual apparatus, general characteristic of social relations», Law and Society, vol. 6 / 2, pp. 127-133.

Pashkovskaya, M. (2013). «Concept of Transparency in Modern Science «Public Administration», Collection of Sciences. Works. Issue 34 «Efficiency of public administration», pp. 135-141.

Tikhomirova, E. (2011). «Communicative EU Policy: information security VS transparency», Actual Problems of International Relations, vol. 102, Ch. I, pp. 22-28.

Nickolson, M. (1974). «The Environmental Revolution». A Guide for the New Masters of the World, New York, San-Francisco, p. VI.

Filipenko, A. S. (2015). «International economic relations: politics», Kyiv: Kyiv Polytechnic University, p. 178.

The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, URL: www.globalgoals.org.

URL: http:// www. globalcompact.org.ua.

Stepanenko, A.V. (2014). «Ecological and Economic Strategies in the System of Provision of Environmental Safety», Science and science of science, vol. 4, pp. 77-84.

Matyushenko, I. Yu. (2017). «Prospects of the development of convergent technologies in the countries of the world and Ukraine for solving global problems»: monograph, Kharkiv: FB Lyuburkina L. M., 448 pp. https://doi.org/10.15550/ASJ.2017.01.010

Bjola, C. (2017). Trends and counter-trends in digital diplomacy /A Global Ranking of Soft Power 2017, Portland. USCC Center on Public Diplomacy, pp. 126-129.

URL: www.softpower30.com «Business Ambassador» in Davos has appeared in Ukraine.

URL : http://reforms.in.ua/ua/news/02.02.2017

URL: http://netherlands.mfa.gov.ua /13.02.2017